Taxing electricity consumption in Spain: evidence to design the post-Kyoto world
Author:
Cansino Muñoz-Repiso, José Manuel; Cardenete Flores, Manuel Alejandro
; Ordoñez Ríos, Manuel; Román Collado, Rocio
ISSN:
1758-3004DOI:
10.1080/17583004.2016.1178397Date:
2016Keyword(s):
Abstract:
In February of 2014, a Group of Experts commissioned by the Government of Spain presented its final report with the measures that could inspire an in-depth tax reform (Spanish Department of Finance, 2014). This report included the use of taxes to contribute to the battle against Climate Change and to reduce others taxes such as Social Security payments.
In February of 2014, a Group of Experts commissioned by the Government of Spain presented its final report with the measures that could inspire an in-depth tax reform (Spanish Department of Finance, 2014). This report included the use of taxes to contribute to the battle against Climate Change and to reduce others taxes such as Social Security payments.
Due to the relevance of fossil fuels in the electricity matrix in Spain, the electrical sector plays a crucial role in mitigation policies such as carbon taxes. Increased prices of electricity can act as an incentive to enhance energy efficiency contributing to CO2 abatement. This paper evaluates a tax on electricity consumption (ECT). Focusing on energy efficiency commitments for Spain as established by EU Authorities for Horizon 2020 (H2020), a pricing model was created to assess economic impacts and its effectiveness in meeting this commitment. The analysis was performed by considering two scenarios, without (Scenario 1) and with (Scenario 2) tax recycling between the new tax and employer-paid social security benefits or contributing to price stability. In Scenario 2, the tax reform is achieved with tax recycling, offsetting the introduction of the ECT by reducing employer-paid social security payments. Two alternative restrictions on the tax reform were considered for the simulation of Scenario 2. In the first case, a restriction was imposed to ensure revenue neutrality (2-I). In the second case, the restriction ought to maintain price stability (2-II). Results from different scenarios offer an important range of possibilities for policy decisions. The results show that with a tax rate equal to 1%, there is a remarkable reduction of CO2 emissions from the electricity sector, and the same happens with other sectors that the literature identifies as drivers of such emissions.
Due to the relevance of fossil fuels in the electricity matrix in Spain, the electrical sector plays a crucial role in mitigation policies such as carbon taxes. Increased prices of electricity can act as an incentive to enhance energy efficiency contributing to CO2 abatement. This paper evaluates a tax on electricity consumption (ECT). Focusing on energy efficiency commitments for Spain as established by EU Authorities for Horizon 2020 (H2020), a pricing model was created to assess economic impacts and its effectiveness in meeting this commitment. The analysis was performed by considering two scenarios, without (Scenario 1) and with (Scenario 2) tax recycling between the new tax and employer-paid social security benefits or contributing to price stability. In Scenario 2, the tax reform is achieved with tax recycling, offsetting the introduction of the ECT by reducing employer-paid social security payments. Two alternative restrictions on the tax reform were considered for the simulation of Scenario 2. In the first case, a restriction was imposed to ensure revenue neutrality (2-I). In the second case, the restriction ought to maintain price stability (2-II). Results from different scenarios offer an important range of possibilities for policy decisions. The results show that with a tax rate equal to 1%, there is a remarkable reduction of CO2 emissions from the electricity sector, and the same happens with other sectors that the literature identifies as drivers of such emissions.
Es la versión aceptada del artículo. Se puede consultar la versión final en: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.1178397
Es la versión aceptada del artículo. Se puede consultar la versión final en: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.1178397
Collections
Files in this item



