| dc.description.abstract | Currently, there are many skeptics questioning the credibility of the Business Roundtables’s pledge
and commitment to build and deliver transparent socially responsible corporate governance
that delivers value for all stakeholders’ future success in business, communities, and country.
Rodríguez-Vilá and Bharadwaj suggest that changing course on a firm’s social purpose is difficult
and ill-advised because success depends on the legitimacy of the brand’s claim. Consequently,
inconsistent social purpose claims may raise stakeholder doubts about the firm’s integrity
or commitment to social purpose. For instance, “social responsibility could be employed
for stakeholder social governing power and economic benefits, rather than societal good”
(Thiel, p. 1). Alternatively, Donaldson and Walsh propose there is no theory of the firm
that can serve us well when we attempt to understand the purpose or place of business in
society. The authors develop the beginnings of a theory of business that is both empirical
and normative to highlight collective value. Clearly, social purpose in organizations is an
underdeveloped topic. This Research Topic aims to advance social purpose in organizations
to better understand how to connect the collective value link between the organization and
society. The 13 articles in this Research Topic contribute to the literature for advancing social
purpose in organizations through research studies from different sectors, industries, countries,
and cultures. These studies are expected to deepen interdisciplinary knowledge on social
purpose in organizations and lay a foundation for interested scholars to undertake in their
future inquiries. | es |