Impact assessment of a multisectoral plan for the promotion of health and social wellbeing in Andalusia (Spain)
Author:
Alonso Trujillo, Federico; Salinas Pérez, José Alberto
; Ruiz Gutierrez-Colosia, Mencía
; González Caballero, Juan Luis; Pinzón Pulido, Sandra; [et al.]
ISSN:
0213-9111DOI:
10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.01.001Date:
2020Keyword(s):
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Plan for the promotion of personal autonomy and prevention of disability in Andalusia (2016-2020) in 13 public administrations during the first year of its implementation; and to analyse the usability and feasibility of the impact assessment ladder used. Method: The Plan addresses the promotion of personal autonomy and the prevention of disabilities and dependencies through a multisectoral approach. Itis structured in strands or lines of work, objectives and actions that have been assessed through the Adoption Impact Ladder (AIL). The analysis ofthe face validity, feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the impact assessment ladder was carried out in 30 actions of the Plan that were rated by 20 experts from the 13 ministries and public agencies involved in the Plan, and an external rater. Results: 176 actions and programmes were launched in 2017. Of these, 67.2% were implemented during the first year. Only one of the 16 objectives had no action initiated during the first year. Moreover, 7 out of 15 objectives implemented were fully multisectoral involving more than three Regional Ministries. The face validity, feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the AIL were good (: 0.72).
Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Plan for the promotion of personal autonomy and prevention of disability in Andalusia (2016-2020) in 13 public administrations during the first year of its implementation; and to analyse the usability and feasibility of the impact assessment ladder used. Method: The Plan addresses the promotion of personal autonomy and the prevention of disabilities and dependencies through a multisectoral approach. Itis structured in strands or lines of work, objectives and actions that have been assessed through the Adoption Impact Ladder (AIL). The analysis ofthe face validity, feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the impact assessment ladder was carried out in 30 actions of the Plan that were rated by 20 experts from the 13 ministries and public agencies involved in the Plan, and an external rater. Results: 176 actions and programmes were launched in 2017. Of these, 67.2% were implemented during the first year. Only one of the 16 objectives had no action initiated during the first year. Moreover, 7 out of 15 objectives implemented were fully multisectoral involving more than three Regional Ministries. The face validity, feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the AIL were good (: 0.72).
Collections
Files in this item



