Brújula Home

Institutional repository of the Universidad Loyola

View Item 
  •   Brújula Home
  • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TRANSFERENCIA
  • Departamento de Derecho
  • Artículos
  • View Item
  •   Brújula Home
  • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TRANSFERENCIA
  • Departamento de Derecho
  • Artículos
  • View Item
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of BrújulaCommunities and CollectionsAuthorsTitlesKeywordsAuthor profilesThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesKeywords

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Añadido Recientemente

Novedades
Repository
How to publish
Visibility
FAQs

The underutilisation of the european supervision order: Framework decision 2009/829/jha as just a scrap of paper

Author:
Montero Pérez de Tudela, Esther; García Ruiz, Carmen RocíoUniversidad Loyola Authority
URI:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/5134
ISSN:
0307-5400
Date:
2021
Keyword(s):

EU law

Pre-trial procedure

Supervision orders

Abstract:

On 23 October 2009, the Council of the European Union (EU) adopted Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, creating the European Supervision Order (ESO). This instrument allows EU citizens involved in criminal proceedings in a Member State and subject to supervision measures (alternatives to pre-trial detention) to return to their own countries pending trial, where they are supervised by the competent judicial authorities. Despite the high number of EU nationals in EU prisons, the ESO has been used sparingly since it became effective. This article examines the obstacles facing its implementation, such as the lack of trust, knowledge about this tool and motivation for using it among the competent authorities and provides proposals for overcoming them: more training for the competent authorities, the creation of a centralised body to act as an intermediary between them or some form of annual monitoring of the use of Framework Decisions (FDs) by the Council of the European Union or similar are some of the proposals developed during this research to promote the use of the ESO and make that this important Decision does not remain a meaningless piece of paper.

On 23 October 2009, the Council of the European Union (EU) adopted Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, creating the European Supervision Order (ESO). This instrument allows EU citizens involved in criminal proceedings in a Member State and subject to supervision measures (alternatives to pre-trial detention) to return to their own countries pending trial, where they are supervised by the competent judicial authorities. Despite the high number of EU nationals in EU prisons, the ESO has been used sparingly since it became effective. This article examines the obstacles facing its implementation, such as the lack of trust, knowledge about this tool and motivation for using it among the competent authorities and provides proposals for overcoming them: more training for the competent authorities, the creation of a centralised body to act as an intermediary between them or some form of annual monitoring of the use of Framework Decisions (FDs) by the Council of the European Union or similar are some of the proposals developed during this research to promote the use of the ESO and make that this important Decision does not remain a meaningless piece of paper.

Show full item record
Collections
  • Artículos
Files in this item
Thumbnail
Tudela_2021_46_ELRev_Issue_3_Offprint.pdf (430.0Kb)
Share
Export to Mendeley
Statistics
Usage statistics
Metrics and citations
Go to Brújula home

Universidad Loyola

Library

Contact

Facebook Loyola BibliotecaTwitter Loyola Biblioteca

The content of the Repository is protected with a Creative Commons license:

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

Creative Commons Image