Brújula Home

Institutional repository of the Universidad Loyola

View Item 
  •   Brújula Home
  • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TRANSFERENCIA
  • Departamento de Derecho
  • Artículos
  • View Item
  •   Brújula Home
  • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TRANSFERENCIA
  • Departamento de Derecho
  • Artículos
  • View Item
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of BrújulaCommunities and CollectionsAuthorsTitlesKeywordsAuthor profilesThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesKeywords

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Añadido Recientemente

Novedades
Repository
How to publish
Visibility
FAQs

European probation order: What doesn’t work? Recommendations to overcome its underuse

Author:
Montero Pérez de Tudela, Esther; García Ruiz, Carmen RocíoUniversidad Loyola Authority
URI:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/5135
ISSN:
1748-8966
DOI:
10.1177/17488958231153351
Date:
2023
Keyword(s):

Criminal justice

Mutual trust

Policy making

Probation

Abstract:

On 28 November 2008, the Council of the European Union (EU) adopted Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, creating the European Probation Order (EPO). It allows EU citizens sentenced or subject to a probation decision to return to their own countries and implement there the alternative penalty or measure, where competent judicial authorities will supervise the execution of the probation measure. Despite the high number of EU nationals sentenced or punished in EU countries, EPO has been used sparingly. This article examines the obstacles facing its implementation, mainly the lack of knowledge about its utility and other EU probation systems or specific gaps of the norm, and provides proposals for overcoming them, such as more training and promotion of mutual knowledge, a common interpretation to get over the differences among systems and some form of annual monitoring of its use, in order to combat the current situation whereby foreigners are overrepresented in prison.

On 28 November 2008, the Council of the European Union (EU) adopted Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, creating the European Probation Order (EPO). It allows EU citizens sentenced or subject to a probation decision to return to their own countries and implement there the alternative penalty or measure, where competent judicial authorities will supervise the execution of the probation measure. Despite the high number of EU nationals sentenced or punished in EU countries, EPO has been used sparingly. This article examines the obstacles facing its implementation, mainly the lack of knowledge about its utility and other EU probation systems or specific gaps of the norm, and provides proposals for overcoming them, such as more training and promotion of mutual knowledge, a common interpretation to get over the differences among systems and some form of annual monitoring of its use, in order to combat the current situation whereby foreigners are overrepresented in prison.

 

Versión aceptada del artículo. Se puede consultar la versión final en https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231153351

Versión aceptada del artículo. Se puede consultar la versión final en https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231153351

 
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artículos
Files in this item
Thumbnail
FINAL VERSIONEuropean probation order What doesn’t work.docx (56.01Kb)
Share
Export to Mendeley
Statistics
Usage statistics
Metrics and citations  
Go to Brújula home

Universidad Loyola

Library

Contact

Facebook Loyola BibliotecaTwitter Loyola Biblioteca

The content of the Repository is protected with a Creative Commons license:

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

Creative Commons Image