Hut Existence or Urban Dwelling? Deprovincializing Heidegger from the East

dc.contributor.author	Wenning, Mario
dc.date.accessioned	2024-02-12T16:36:56Z
dc.date.available	2024-02-12T16:36:56Z
dc.date.issued	2023
dc.identifier.citation	Wenning, M. (2023). Hut Existence or Urban Dwelling? Deprovincializing Heidegger from the East. Asian Studies, 11(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.1.51-68	es
dc.identifier.issn	2350-4226
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/5179
dc.description.abstract	Heidegger’s “Creative Landscapes: Why do we remain in the provinces?” and “Dialogue on Language” reveal the importance of rootedness for his existentialism. The article engages with the provinciality of Heidegger’s thought by juxtaposing his solitary “hut existence” to Buddhist compassion and the urban aesthetics of Kuki Shūzō. Turning to the East allows for a deprovincialization of Heideggerian themes. The rich philosophical legacy of reflecting on intercultural modernization and urbanization processes in East Asian philosophical	es
dc.language.iso	eng	es
dc.title	Hut Existence or Urban Dwelling? Deprovincializing Heidegger from the East	es
dc.type	article	es
dc.identifier.doi	10.4312/as.2023.11.1.51-68
dc.issue.number	1	es
dc.journal.title	Asian Studies	es
dc.page.initial	51	es
dc.page.final	68	es
dc.rights.accessRights	openAccess	es
dc.subject.keyword	Heidegger	es
dc.subject.keyword	Kuki	es
dc.subject.keyword	Buddhism	es
dc.subject.keyword	Provincialism	es
dc.subject.keyword	Urbanism	es
dc.volume.number	11	es