| dc.contributor.author | Wenning, Mario | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-12T17:07:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-12T17:07:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Wenning, M. (2017), Rational Mysticism: Hegel on Magic and China. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 44: 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.12323 | es |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0301-8121 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/5191 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Hegel’s conception of a universal history of reason is usually interpreted
as a Eurocentric project that is dismissive of the genuine
contributions by other cultures. In contrast to this assumption, his
views concerning Chinese philosophical traditions evolved significantly
in his late Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Hegel
increasingly acknowledges a unique contribution of Confucianism
and especially Daoism. While Confucianism is depicted as a natural
religion of magic in which the emperor governs as the supreme
magician, Daoism revolts against the emperor’s nepotism and turns
to the Dao to elaborate a speculative philosophy of reason. The
paper argues that the search for a rational form of mysticism is the
basis for increasingly valuing the Chinese contributions to a conception
of reason that incorporates mystical elements. | es |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es |
| dc.title | Rational Mysticism: Hegel on Magic and China | es |
| dc.type | article | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1540-6253.12323 | |
| dc.issue.number | 3 | es |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Chinese Philosophy | es |
| dc.page.initial | 154 | es |
| dc.page.final | 174 | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | embargoedAccess | es |
| dc.volume.number | 44 | es |