Show simple item record

Optimal midterm peak shaving cost in an electricity management system using behind customers’ smart meter configuration

dc.contributor.authorSánchez de la Nieta, Agustín
dc.contributor.authorIlieva, Iliana
dc.contributor.authorGibescu, Madeleine
dc.contributor.authorBremdal, Bernt
dc.contributor.authorSimonsen, Stig
dc.contributor.authorGramme, Eivind
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-12T11:04:54Z
dc.date.available2025-08-12T11:04:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-03
dc.identifier.citationNieta, A. A. S. de la, Ilieva, I., Gibescu, M., Bremdal, B., Simonsen, S., & Gramme, E. (2021). Optimal midterm peak shaving cost in an electricity management system using behind customers’ smart meter configuration. Applied Energy, 283(116282), 116282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116282es
dc.identifier.issn0306-2619
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/6759
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses a local electricity system (LES) comprising photovoltaic production (PV), a connection to the distribution network, local loads and an energy storage system (ESS). Given the flexibility of the ESS, the LES can provide a peak shaving service (PSS) to the grid operator based on the actual monthly power tariff. This paper proposes a stochastic mixed-integer linear programming problem that maximises the expected operating profit of the LES midterm. Assuming a behind customers’ smart meter configuration, income is derived from selling the energy of prosumers to other external electrical areas. If the costs are higher than the income, the net profit will be negative, i.e. a net loss. The cost component of the objective function can be reduced through the management of local resources and by providing PSS to the distribution network operator to minimise the power cost of the monthly power tariff. The model is tested for 720 h (considering a month of 30 days) in three cases: (i) without PV and ESS; (ii) with PV and ESS, where losses are 0%; (iii) with PV and ESS, where losses are 18%. Due to the monthly power tariff, the net loss of the LES is reduced through the optimal management of local resources when the ESS losses are lower than 18%. To assess seasonal implications about the LES, the 12 months of the year are also tested. The month of October indicated the highest peak shaving, while the lowest peak shaving depended on the ESS losses.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleOptimal midterm peak shaving cost in an electricity management system using behind customers’ smart meter configurationes
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116282
dc.journal.titleApplied Energyes
dc.page.initial116282es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordElectricity management systemes
dc.subject.keywordEnergy storage systemes
dc.subject.keywordLocal loades
dc.subject.keywordDecentralised PV productiones
dc.subject.keywordPeak shaving servicees
dc.subject.keywordProsumeres
dc.subject.keywordStochastic mixed-integer linear problemes
dc.volume.number283es


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional