Show simple item record

Risk of recurrent ischemic stroke after non‑cardioembolic ischemic stroke in England and Denmark

dc.contributor.authorGaist, David
dc.contributor.authorGonzáléz-Pérez, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorTore Jørgensen, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorBjerre Høyer, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorMöller, Sören
dc.contributor.authorKarlsdotter, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorBamber, Luke
dc.contributor.authorXeni, Jason
dc.contributor.authorLowe, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Mukul
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Rodriguez, Luis Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-25T11:40:00Z
dc.date.available2026-06-25T11:40:00Z
dc.date.issued2026-05-23
dc.identifier.citationGaist, D., Gonzáléz-Pérez, A., Jørgensen, K.T. et al. Risk of recurrent ischemic stroke after non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke in England and Denmark. J Neurol 273, 337 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-13872-4es
dc.identifier.issn0340-5354
dc.identifier.issn1432-1459
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/7315
dc.description.abstractBackground Recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) can occur following a non-cardioembolic IS (NCIS), despite following second ary prevention guidelines. We quantified recurrent IS risk following discharge from first-ever NCIS in clinical practice. Methods Adult patients with first-ever NCIS were identified in England (January 2012–February 2020) and Denmark (Janu ary 2012–December 2021) and followed through March 2021 (England) and August 2022 (Denmark). Primary outcome was recurrent IS (incidence rates [IRs] per 100 person years at 12 months and over total follow-up). Cumulative hazard per 100 person years with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated. Stroke severity at index and recurrent IS were compared in Danish patients. Results Overall, 52,419 English and 62,501 Danish patients were included (respective mean follow-ups: 3.0 and 3.9 years). Recurrent IS events totaled 5857 in England, 9489 in Denmark. IRs/100 person years were similar (England: 3.74 [95% CI 3.64–3.84]; Denmark: 3.87 [95% CI 3.79–3.95]), and highest in the first year (England: 7.39 [95% CI 7.14–7.65]; Denmark: 7.96 [95% CI 7.73–8.20]). Five-year cumulative hazard of recurrent IS was 16.53 (95% CI 16.06–17.01) in England, 18.05 (95% CI 17.64–18.47) in Denmark. Among Danish cases with severity data (n = 5540), versus index strokes, recurrent IS events were more often moderate (13.84% vs 19.01%) or severe (3.57% vs 7.92%). Conclusions Recurrent IS after NCIS was highest in the first year and remained substantial over 5 years. In Denmark, recurrent IS severity was worse than index events. These findings underscore unmet needs for improved secondary stroke prevention.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleRisk of recurrent ischemic stroke after non‑cardioembolic ischemic stroke in England and Denmarkes
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00415-026-13872-4
dc.issue.number337es
dc.journal.titleJournal of Neurologyes
dc.page.initial1es
dc.page.final12es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordRecurrent ischemic strokees
dc.subject.keywordNon-cardioembolic ischemic strokees
dc.subject.keywordReal-world evidencees
dc.subject.keywordSeverityes
dc.subject.keywordUnmet needses
dc.volume.number273es


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional