Brújula Home

Institutional repository of the Universidad Loyola

View Item 
  •   Brújula Home
  • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TRANSFERENCIA
  • Departamento Psicología
  • Artículos
  • View Item
  •   Brújula Home
  • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TRANSFERENCIA
  • Departamento Psicología
  • Artículos
  • View Item
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of BrújulaCommunities and CollectionsAuthorsTitlesKeywordsAuthor profilesThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesKeywords

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Añadido Recientemente

Novedades
Repository
How to publish
Visibility
FAQs

A comparative evaluation of 23 projects on mental health and wellbeing for veterans and first responders

Author:
Lukersmith, Sue; Woods, Cindy; Salvador Carulla, Luis; Niyonsenga, Theo; Mohanty, Itismita; [et al.]
URI:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/7389
ISSN:
0010-440X
DOI:
10.1016/j.comppsych.2025.152599
Date:
2025-08
Keyword(s):

Complexity; Context; Evaluation; Impact analysis; Implementation processes.

Abstract:

Background: Veterans and First Responders (VFR) are at risk of developing a range of mental health disorders because of cumulative exposure to critical incidents at work. Two Philanthropic organisations funded 15 organisations, which collectively implemented 23 highly heterogeneous and international early intervention mental ill-health and suicide prevention Projects. The aim was identify and collaborate with Projects with a multi-project evaluation. The evaluation examined multiple domains including intervention effectiveness but critically the implementation processes impacts for potential replication or scale up. This paper reports on the methods and evaluation results of implementation processes, impact analysis and sustainability. Method: The evaluation involved ecosystems and complex systems approaches using novel methods and tools. There was multiple preparatory evaluation steps including developing indices for complexity and context. The Global Impact Analytics Framework (GIAF) toolkit was used to evaluate the implementation processes. Methodological tools included qualitative analysis, descriptive statistics, GIAF ladders/scales and checklists (qualitative and quantitative data). Results: We provide the results on characteristics (organisational, Project and participants), GIAF process components (planning, pre-engagement, pre-readiness/readiness, dissemination/diffusion, usability/sustainability, adoption and uptake). All Project interventions were assessed as usable, adoptable and have capacity to be sustained, with financial resources. Uptake of the intervention was mostly high. Conclusion: Complex multi-project evaluation of highly heterogenous Projects implemented in the real world across different countries is possible and provides valuable information and learnings. The evaluation results establish benchmarks including Project pre-engagement with potential end-users, continuous, frequent collaboration between Project and evaluation teams, adequate contract duration for sufficient recruitment and intervention.

Background: Veterans and First Responders (VFR) are at risk of developing a range of mental health disorders because of cumulative exposure to critical incidents at work. Two Philanthropic organisations funded 15 organisations, which collectively implemented 23 highly heterogeneous and international early intervention mental ill-health and suicide prevention Projects. The aim was identify and collaborate with Projects with a multi-project evaluation. The evaluation examined multiple domains including intervention effectiveness but critically the implementation processes impacts for potential replication or scale up. This paper reports on the methods and evaluation results of implementation processes, impact analysis and sustainability. Method: The evaluation involved ecosystems and complex systems approaches using novel methods and tools. There was multiple preparatory evaluation steps including developing indices for complexity and context. The Global Impact Analytics Framework (GIAF) toolkit was used to evaluate the implementation processes. Methodological tools included qualitative analysis, descriptive statistics, GIAF ladders/scales and checklists (qualitative and quantitative data). Results: We provide the results on characteristics (organisational, Project and participants), GIAF process components (planning, pre-engagement, pre-readiness/readiness, dissemination/diffusion, usability/sustainability, adoption and uptake). All Project interventions were assessed as usable, adoptable and have capacity to be sustained, with financial resources. Uptake of the intervention was mostly high. Conclusion: Complex multi-project evaluation of highly heterogenous Projects implemented in the real world across different countries is possible and provides valuable information and learnings. The evaluation results establish benchmarks including Project pre-engagement with potential end-users, continuous, frequent collaboration between Project and evaluation teams, adequate contract duration for sufficient recruitment and intervention.

Show full item record
Collections
  • Artículos
Files in this item
Thumbnail
Lukersmith et al. 2025. Evaluation Movember.pdf (1.328Mb)
Share
Export to Mendeley
Statistics
Usage statistics
Metrics and citations  
Go to Brújula home

Universidad Loyola

Library

Contact

Facebook Loyola BibliotecaTwitter Loyola Biblioteca

The content of the Repository is protected with a Creative Commons license:

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

Creative Commons Image