Brújula Home

Institutional repository of the Universidad Loyola

View Item 
  •   Brújula Home
  • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TRANSFERENCIA
  • Departamento Comunicación y Educación
  • Artículos
  • View Item
  •   Brújula Home
  • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TRANSFERENCIA
  • Departamento Comunicación y Educación
  • Artículos
  • View Item
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of BrújulaCommunities and CollectionsAuthorsTitlesKeywordsAuthor profilesThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesKeywords

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Añadido Recientemente

Novedades
Repository
How to publish
Visibility
FAQs

Eccentric-Overload Training in Team-Sport Functional Performance: Constant Bilateral Vertical Versus Variable Unilateral Multidirectional Movements

Author:
Gonzalo-Skok, Oliver; Tous-Fajardo, Julio; Valero-Campos, Carlos; Berzosa, César; Bataller, Ana Vanessa; [et al.]
URI:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/7110
ISSN:
1555-0265
DOI:
10.1123/ijspp.2016-0251
Date:
2017-08
Keyword(s):

Resistance training

Eccentric overload

Functional performance

Variable training

Abstract:

Purpose: To analyze the effects of 2 different eccentric-overload training (EOT) programs, using a rotational conical pulley, on functional performance in team-sport players. A traditional movement paradigm (ie, squat) including several sets of 1 bilateral and vertical movement was compared with a novel paradigm including a different exercise in each set of unilateral and multidirectional movements. Methods: Forty-eight amateur or semiprofessional team-sport players were randomly assigned to an EOT program including either the same bilateral vertical (CBV, n = 24) movement (squat) or different unilateral multidirectional (VUMD, n = 24) movements. Training programs consisted of 6 sets of 1 exercise (CBV) or 1 set of 6 exercises (VUMD) x 6-10 repetitions with 3 min of passive recovery between sets and exercises, biweekly for 8 wk. Functional-performance assessment included several change-of-direction (COD) tests, a 25-m linear-sprint test, unilateral multidirectional jumping tests (ie, lateral, horizontal, and vertical), and a bilateral vertical-jump test. Results: Within-group analysis showed substantial improvements in all tests in both groups, with VUMD showing more robust adaptations in pooled COD tests and lateral/horizontal jumping, whereas the opposite occurred in CBV respecting linear sprinting and vertical jumping. Between-groups analyses showed substantially better results in lateral jumps (ES = 0.21), left-leg horizontal jump (ES = 0.35), and 10-m COD with right leg (ES = 0.42) in VUMD than in CBV. In contrast, left-leg countermovement jump (ES = 0.26) was possibly better in CBV than in VUMD. Conclusions: Eight weeks of EOT induced substantial improvements in functional-performance tests, although the force-vector application may play a key role to develop different and specific functional adaptations.

Purpose: To analyze the effects of 2 different eccentric-overload training (EOT) programs, using a rotational conical pulley, on functional performance in team-sport players. A traditional movement paradigm (ie, squat) including several sets of 1 bilateral and vertical movement was compared with a novel paradigm including a different exercise in each set of unilateral and multidirectional movements. Methods: Forty-eight amateur or semiprofessional team-sport players were randomly assigned to an EOT program including either the same bilateral vertical (CBV, n = 24) movement (squat) or different unilateral multidirectional (VUMD, n = 24) movements. Training programs consisted of 6 sets of 1 exercise (CBV) or 1 set of 6 exercises (VUMD) x 6-10 repetitions with 3 min of passive recovery between sets and exercises, biweekly for 8 wk. Functional-performance assessment included several change-of-direction (COD) tests, a 25-m linear-sprint test, unilateral multidirectional jumping tests (ie, lateral, horizontal, and vertical), and a bilateral vertical-jump test. Results: Within-group analysis showed substantial improvements in all tests in both groups, with VUMD showing more robust adaptations in pooled COD tests and lateral/horizontal jumping, whereas the opposite occurred in CBV respecting linear sprinting and vertical jumping. Between-groups analyses showed substantially better results in lateral jumps (ES = 0.21), left-leg horizontal jump (ES = 0.35), and 10-m COD with right leg (ES = 0.42) in VUMD than in CBV. In contrast, left-leg countermovement jump (ES = 0.26) was possibly better in CBV than in VUMD. Conclusions: Eight weeks of EOT induced substantial improvements in functional-performance tests, although the force-vector application may play a key role to develop different and specific functional adaptations.

 

Es la versión aceptada del documento. Se puede consultar la versión final en http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0251

Es la versión aceptada del documento. Se puede consultar la versión final en http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0251

 
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artículos
Files in this item
Thumbnail
Gonzalo-Skok_Eccentricoverloadtraininginteam-sportsfunctionalperformance_IJSPP2016_AV.pdf (598.0Kb)
Share
Export to Mendeley
Statistics
Usage statistics
Metrics and citations  
Go to Brújula home

Universidad Loyola

Library

Contact

Facebook Loyola BibliotecaTwitter Loyola Biblioteca

The content of the Repository is protected with a Creative Commons license:

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

Creative Commons Image