Show simple item record

Eccentric-Overload Training in Team-Sport Functional Performance: Constant Bilateral Vertical Versus Variable Unilateral Multidirectional Movements

dc.contributor.authorGonzalo-Skok, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorTous-Fajardo, Julio
dc.contributor.authorValero-Campos, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorBerzosa, César
dc.contributor.authorBataller, Ana Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorArjol-Serrano, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorMoras, Gerard
dc.contributor.authorMendez-Villanueva, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-10T12:18:40Z
dc.date.available2026-02-10T12:18:40Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.identifier.citationGonzalo-Skok, O., Tous-Fajardo, J., Valero-Campo, C., Berzosa, C., Bataller, A. V., Arjol-Serrano, J. L., Moras, G., & Mendez-Villanueva, A. (2017). Eccentric-Overload Training in Team-Sport Functional Performance: Constant Bilateral Vertical Versus Variable Unilateral Multidirectional Movements. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(7), 951-958. Retrieved Feb 10, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0251es
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12412/7110
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To analyze the effects of 2 different eccentric-overload training (EOT) programs, using a rotational conical pulley, on functional performance in team-sport players. A traditional movement paradigm (ie, squat) including several sets of 1 bilateral and vertical movement was compared with a novel paradigm including a different exercise in each set of unilateral and multidirectional movements. Methods: Forty-eight amateur or semiprofessional team-sport players were randomly assigned to an EOT program including either the same bilateral vertical (CBV, n = 24) movement (squat) or different unilateral multidirectional (VUMD, n = 24) movements. Training programs consisted of 6 sets of 1 exercise (CBV) or 1 set of 6 exercises (VUMD) x 6-10 repetitions with 3 min of passive recovery between sets and exercises, biweekly for 8 wk. Functional-performance assessment included several change-of-direction (COD) tests, a 25-m linear-sprint test, unilateral multidirectional jumping tests (ie, lateral, horizontal, and vertical), and a bilateral vertical-jump test. Results: Within-group analysis showed substantial improvements in all tests in both groups, with VUMD showing more robust adaptations in pooled COD tests and lateral/horizontal jumping, whereas the opposite occurred in CBV respecting linear sprinting and vertical jumping. Between-groups analyses showed substantially better results in lateral jumps (ES = 0.21), left-leg horizontal jump (ES = 0.35), and 10-m COD with right leg (ES = 0.42) in VUMD than in CBV. In contrast, left-leg countermovement jump (ES = 0.26) was possibly better in CBV than in VUMD. Conclusions: Eight weeks of EOT induced substantial improvements in functional-performance tests, although the force-vector application may play a key role to develop different and specific functional adaptations.es
dc.description.abstractEs la versión aceptada del documento. Se puede consultar la versión final en http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0251es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.titleEccentric-Overload Training in Team-Sport Functional Performance: Constant Bilateral Vertical Versus Variable Unilateral Multidirectional Movementses
dc.typearticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijspp.2016-0251
dc.issue.number7es
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performancees
dc.page.initial951es
dc.page.final958es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.subject.keywordResistance traininges
dc.subject.keywordEccentric overloades
dc.subject.keywordFunctional performancees
dc.subject.keywordVariable traininges
dc.volume.number12es


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record